1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
disa [49]
3 years ago
5

How has the confirmation power change reflected political trends in American government?

Law
1 answer:
lukranit [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Key points

The Framers of the US Constitution structured the government so that the three branches have separate powers. The branches must both cooperate and compete to enact policy.

Each of the branches has the power to check the other two, which ensures that no one branch can become too powerful and that government as a whole is constrained.

This structure ensures that the people’s will is represented by allowing citizens multiple access points to influence public policy, and permitting the removal of officials who abuse their power.

The structure of US government: separation of powers

By the late 1780s, it had become clear that the first governmental system of the United States, the Articles of Confederation, wasn’t working. The central government under the Articles lacked a strong executive and a method for resolving disputes at the national level.

But adding a strong executive branch to the US government might pose the opposite problem. Would an executive, wielding the power of the army, become too powerful? Would a federal government with more power overall soon become tyrannical?

At the Constitutional Convention, the Framers debated these issues. Their ultimate solution was to separate the powers of government among three branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—so that each branch had to cooperate with the others in order to accomplish policymaking goals. For example, although the executive branch commands the military, only the legislative branch can declare war and make funds available to pay and provision the army. Therefore, both the legislative branch (Congress) and the executive branch (the president) must consent for the United States to go to war.

Accordingly, each branch of government has unique powers. As the branch most responsive to the will of the people (who elect its members), Congress has the power to pass laws, declare war, ratify treaties, and levy taxes. The executive branch conducts foreign affairs and commands the armed forces. The judicial branch interprets the laws of Congress and the actions of the president to determine whether they are constitutional.

Powers of the branches of government

Legislative branch

Executive branch

Judicial branch

Pass laws Veto legislation Declare laws unconstitutional

Declare war Command armed forces Hear cases on federal law

Impeach president and judges Grant pardons Preside over impeachment trials

Approve presidential appointments Appoint judges, ambassadors, department heads Declare presidential acts unconstitutional

Ratify treaties Conduct foreign affairs and negotiate treaties

Levy taxes  

Establish number of Supreme Court justices  

Regulate Supreme Court's jurisdiction  

Explanation:

You might be interested in
6.
rodikova [14]

Answer:

option a is the correct option

7 0
2 years ago
In gideon v. wainwright, the united states supreme court ruled that the:
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

Gideon v. Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
If you were a juror in a murder case, and the DNA, blood, fingerprints, or other scientific evidence conflicted with what witnes
Llana [10]

Answer:

if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)

3 0
2 years ago
Can you pls help to number 1 23 thank you :)
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

1-a scientific theory is an in-depth explanation of the observed phenomenon. A law is a statement about an observed phenomenon or a unifying concept.

2-substantiated, explanatory, predictive, and testable

3-It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the constant in the circular flow model?
tiny-mole [99]

The two flows in the circular flow model are the real flow and money flow. Real flow being counterclockwise of economic resources and finished goods and services. Money flow would be the counter wise direction of income and consumption expenditures.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Many of the results of the National Crime Victimization Survey are found in the Publications and Products section. There you
    5·1 answer
  • The crime scene investigation team arrives at a car crash scene and finds that both the drivers are taken away in an ambulance a
    7·1 answer
  • Anyone else sick of these mask? (please no hate i'm just wonder and I do follow the rules)
    9·2 answers
  • Answer this please as well
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think Americans have too much or too little freedom of speech? Explain
    15·2 answers
  • How does U.S. foreign policy influence world affairs? Provide several examples in your short answer.
    10·1 answer
  • What is a direct contrast to a market economy?
    11·2 answers
  • What physical property can help characterize fragments of glass at a crime scene?
    6·1 answer
  • 1.What is meant by executory consideration?A. Consideration provided by an executor.B.The exchange of consideration.Where consid
    15·1 answer
  • In a country with limited power
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!