1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nika2105 [10]
3 years ago
8

Consider this argument: "if we drive on the pacific coast highway near san francisco we can see islands off the pacific coast. l

ook! we can see islands off the pacific coast. so we are driving on the pacific coast highway near san francisco." that argument is an example of __________.
Social Studies
2 answers:
miv72 [106K]3 years ago
7 0
This is an example of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning happens when you make broad generalizations from specific observations. In this example, it suggests that since they can see the islands (observation), they must be on the highway (generalization). Inductive reasoning might not always be as accurate in some cases as deductive reasoning.
Finger [1]3 years ago
3 0

The answer is inductive reasoning.

<h2>Further Explanation </h2>

The reasoning is a thought process that departs from sensory observation (empirical observation) which results in several concepts and understandings. Based on similar observations, similar propositions will be formed, based on several propositions that are known or considered true, one concludes a new proposition that was previously unknown. This process is called reasoning. In reasoning, propositions that form the basis of inference are called premises (antecedents) and the results of conclusions are called conclusions (consequence). The relation between premise and conclusion is called a consequence.

Method of reasoning

There are two types of methods in reasoning, namely inductive and deductive.

  1. Deductive reasoning is reasoning that applies general things first to be connected in specific parts. Deductive reasoning (top-down logic) contrasts with inductive reasoning (bottom-up logic) and generally begins with one or more general statements or premises to reach logical conclusions. If the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Deductive retrieval is used by scientists and mathematicians to prove their hypotheses.
  2. Inductive reasoning is reasoning that begins by explaining specific problems (containing proof and examples of facts) that end with conclusions in the form of general statements. Inductive reasoning is reasoning from a particular case or case and obtaining general rules. This contradicts the scientific method. This makes generalizations by observing patterns and drawing conclusions that might be wrong.  

Learn more

definition of The reasoning brainly.com/question/7186437

definition of Deductive reasoning brainly.com/question/7186437

definition of Inductive reasoning brainly.com/question/7186437

Details

Grade: High School

Subject: Social studies

keywords: The reasoning

You might be interested in
Which water route did the people of Aksum use to trade with the Romans?
larisa [96]
I believe that they used The Red Sea

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following sentences correctly uses a hyphen to continue to the next line?
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Sentence 3 is the one that appropriately inserts a hyphen to move to the next line. Macie put forth a lot of effort every day to pursue her dream of playing professional softball.

How should a hyphen be used to move to the next line?

When a word cannot fit in a line, a hyphen is used to separate the word.

When a writer has to separate a word into syllables in order to go to the next line, they should use a hyphen. A one-syllable word cannot be divided according to the hyphen rule.

The erroneous usage of the hyphen is evident in Sentence 1 when "r" is separated from "detector."

The hyphen should have been placed between straw and berries in Sentence 2.

Joy is a one-syllable word in Sentence 4.

Learn more about Detector brainly.com/question/13155639

#SPJ9

3 0
2 years ago
What parallel can you identify between the modern U.S. legal system and Catherine the Great's discussion of innocence and guilt?
Zigmanuir [339]
<span>Catherine the Great and the Founding Fathers of the US both believed that there needed to be a body of laws to avoid chaos and to insure fairness.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
An integrated understanding of psychological disorders in terms of three interactive environments is MOST clearly provided by a
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

bio social

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
All of the following embarrassed the US during the Cold War expect:
ira [324]

Answer:

D fall of Berlin wall

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the social-psychological definition of "aggression," which of the behaviors below is the best example of aggression
    5·1 answer
  • Willie gets paid $1000 every two weeks and follows the same spending and saving plan unless an emergency arises.
    9·1 answer
  • The "Salt March" of 1930 was a key moment in the independence movement of people in what country?
    14·2 answers
  • What is most likely the reason why the news media would choose to show a video of people stranded on the roof of their flooded h
    7·1 answer
  • Match these terms.
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about social choice procedures is NOT correct? Group of answer choices The Borda count satisfi
    13·1 answer
  • Regarding the Magna Carta, which statement is false?
    7·1 answer
  • There are ______ main disorders that are characterized as somatoform. A. Two B. Seven C. Five D. Too many to characterize
    5·2 answers
  • Question 5 of 10
    7·1 answer
  • Which factors affect the demand for a product?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!