I would say the central idea is a thank you to those who inspired, believed in and helped the author publish their new book. To pay homage means to "give respect to."
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
In keeping with the subject of the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, May 17, 2014 marks the 60th anniversary of the issuance of the decision on Brown v. Board of Education. Brown is a landmark case in which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that, contrary to the legal doctrine of separate but equal, “separate education facilities are inherently unequal” and ended segregation in the United States. While most people educated in the United States are familiar with Brown, I would like to bring your attention to more arcane cases, with arguably equal significance.
As I wrote about earlier in the blog, the case Hernández v. Texas was decided just two weeks prior to Brown; but there is another little-known case that was instrumental for the American civil rights movement: Méndez v. Westminster. While many scholars of educational desegregation assure us that the beginning of the end of the “separate but equal” doctrine was set underway with Brown v. Board of Education. It could be argued that the beginning of that end may actually date back seven years prior, Méndez v. Westminster, which ended the almost 100 years of segregation that had remained a practice since the end of the U.S.-Mexico War of 1848 and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The end of the U.S.-Mexico War gave rise to “anti-immigrant sentiments [that] resulted in increased measures to segregate Mexican-Americans from so-called ‘white’ public institutions such as swimming pools, parks, schools, and eating establishments.”
Méndez v. Westminster School District of Orange County was a federal court case that challenged racial segregation in the education system of Orange County, California. Five Mexican-American fathers—Thomas Estrada, William Guzmán, Gonzalo Méndez, Frank Palomino, and Lorenzo Ramírez—set out to challenge the practice of school segregation in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Their claim was that their children and some 5,000 others of Mexican ancestry, had fallen victim to unconstitutional discriminatory practices by being forced to attend separate schools that had been designated “schools for Mexicans” in the school districts of El Modena, Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and Westminster—all of which were in Orange County. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the segregation of Mexican and Mexican-American students, by relegating them to “Mexican Schools,” was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
Answer:
The Louisiana State Capitol Building
Explanation:
The correct answer is concept
The concept is that which is conceived in thinking about something or someone. It is the way of thinking about something, consisting of a type of appreciation through an opinion expressed, for example, when a good or bad concept of someone is formed. In this case, concept can be synonymous with reputation.
It can also be interpreted as a mental symbol, an abstract notion contained in each word of a language that corresponds to a set of characteristics common to a class of beings, objects or abstract entities, determining how things are.
The concept expresses the qualities of a thing or an object, determining what it is and its meaning.
The words in several languages have the same meaning because they express the same concept.
Answer:
Quota sampling
Explanation:
Quota sampling: It gathers representative data from a particular group of people. In this sampling method, the data is being chosen from a particular sub-group of a population. This is considered to be more reliable as compared to other non-probability sampling methods such as snowball sampling.
Example: A researcher can take 200 males participants between the age of 18-25.
In the given question, the graph represents the quota sampling method.
