Answer:
open a rear window in your car
Answer:
A. U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Explanation:
A is the answer. B is incorrect because the U.S. Circuit Courts (not to be confused with the CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS) were the direct predecessor to the Circuit Court of Appeals. C is incorrect because the question is asking about the federal court system, not the Floridian court system. D is incorrect because there is no such thing as U.S. District Courts of Appeals.
Answer: Hi I hope that helps!
Explanation: You might have to pay late fees. Depending on how long it has been expired. But that is all I know. I think that should help a little bit I hope that helps you it may not be all you were looking for but I think you will need that.
Have a good day/night
A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.
<h3>What are individual rights?</h3>
Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.
<h3>What is control and authority?</h3>
Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.
In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.
Learn more about individual rights in: brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.
Explanation:
In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.
