Answer:
a) (2x+7)(x-4)
b) x = -7/2 and x = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
a) (2x ?)(x ?)
set up the above and considered factors of 28 that, when paired with 2, would give me -1x and -28 → (1·28, 2·14, 4·7)
after trial-and-error, found that 4 and 7 worked (used un-FOIL)
b) 2x + 7 = 0
2x = -7
x = -7/2
*********
x-4 = 0
x = 4
Well, let's say the numbers are "a" and "b"
so a * b = ab
ok... now, if we reduce "a" by 25%, that means the new size is just 75% of the old one, how much is 75% of a? well, (75/100) * a, or 0.75a
now let's reduce "b" by 50%, that means the new size is 50% or half, how much is 50% of b? well (50/100)*b, or 0.5b
now, the new size of "ab" is just 0.375ab... well, let's revert the decimal format by simply multiplying by 100
0.375 * 100, is 37.5%
the new size of "ab" is just 37.5% of the original "ab"
it decreased by 100 - 37.5 or 62.5%
Answer:
true ...
believe it or not there is an exponential sequence that can make that
result
f(x) =
<u>x /// 2(x+2) -1</u>
-1 /// 1
0 /// 3
1 /// 5
2 /// 7
Step-by-step explanation:
3. <span>Corollary
4. Congruent Polygons
</span>
2.50f=15
f=6
Thats what I think it is, I'm sorry if I'm incorrect.