1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nasty-shy [4]
2 years ago
6

Please help me thanks

Mathematics
2 answers:
eimsori [14]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

slope=\frac{y_{2} -y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}} =\frac{9-6}{3-2} =\frac{3}{1}=3

Oliga [24]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

equation, y=3x, because when x is 1, y is 3, so the equation is y=3x, and the slope is equal to how much of x is equal to y, so 3

Pls brainliest

You might be interested in
(2n^4 - 8 - 3n) - (4n^2 + 7n +4) <br> I have to simplify but don't know how to
Ahat [919]
First remove the parenthes  as there is a negtive outside the second parentheses the signs of the terms inside change.

= 2n^4 - 8 - 3n - 4n^2 - 7n - 4

Now simplify like terms

= 2n^4 - 4n^2 - 10n - 12

= 2(n^4 - 2n^2 - 5n - 6)
3 0
3 years ago
A ____ is a term with a number part but no variable. (WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST) (❁´◡`❁)​
Margaret [11]

Answer: it’s a Constant!

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Let X1 and X2 be independent random variables with mean μand variance σ².
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

a) E(\hat \theta_1) =\frac{1}{2} [E(X_1) +E(X_2)]= \frac{1}{2} [\mu + \mu] = \mu

So then we conclude that \hat \theta_1 is an unbiased estimator of \mu

E(\hat \theta_2) =\frac{1}{4} [E(X_1) +3E(X_2)]= \frac{1}{4} [\mu + 3\mu] = \mu

So then we conclude that \hat \theta_2 is an unbiased estimator of \mu

b) Var(\hat \theta_1) =\frac{1}{4} [\sigma^2 + \sigma^2 ] =\frac{\sigma^2}{2}

Var(\hat \theta_2) =\frac{1}{16} [\sigma^2 + 9\sigma^2 ] =\frac{5\sigma^2}{8}

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we know that we have two random variables:

X_1 , X_2 both with mean \mu = \mu and variance \sigma^2

And we define the following estimators:

\hat \theta_1 = \frac{X_1 + X_2}{2}

\hat \theta_2 = \frac{X_1 + 3X_2}{4}

Part a

In order to see if both estimators are unbiased we need to proof if the expected value of the estimators are equal to the real value of the parameter:

E(\hat \theta_i) = \mu , i = 1,2

So let's find the expected values for each estimator:

E(\hat \theta_1) = E(\frac{X_1 +X_2}{2})

Using properties of expected value we have this:

E(\hat \theta_1) =\frac{1}{2} [E(X_1) +E(X_2)]= \frac{1}{2} [\mu + \mu] = \mu

So then we conclude that \hat \theta_1 is an unbiased estimator of \mu

For the second estimator we have:

E(\hat \theta_2) = E(\frac{X_1 + 3X_2}{4})

Using properties of expected value we have this:

E(\hat \theta_2) =\frac{1}{4} [E(X_1) +3E(X_2)]= \frac{1}{4} [\mu + 3\mu] = \mu

So then we conclude that \hat \theta_2 is an unbiased estimator of \mu

Part b

For the variance we need to remember this property: If a is a constant and X a random variable then:

Var(aX) = a^2 Var(X)

For the first estimator we have:

Var(\hat \theta_1) = Var(\frac{X_1 +X_2}{2})

Var(\hat \theta_1) =\frac{1}{4} Var(X_1 +X_2)=\frac{1}{4} [Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) + 2 Cov (X_1 , X_2)]

Since both random variables are independent we know that Cov(X_1, X_2 ) = 0 so then we have:

Var(\hat \theta_1) =\frac{1}{4} [\sigma^2 + \sigma^2 ] =\frac{\sigma^2}{2}

For the second estimator we have:

Var(\hat \theta_2) = Var(\frac{X_1 +3X_2}{4})

Var(\hat \theta_2) =\frac{1}{16} Var(X_1 +3X_2)=\frac{1}{4} [Var(X_1) + Var(3X_2) + 2 Cov (X_1 , 3X_2)]

Since both random variables are independent we know that Cov(X_1, X_2 ) = 0 so then we have:

Var(\hat \theta_2) =\frac{1}{16} [\sigma^2 + 9\sigma^2 ] =\frac{5\sigma^2}{8}

7 0
3 years ago
You have a goal to save $250. You have saved $160? What percent of your goal have you reached?
FromTheMoon [43]
The answer is 64 percent
8 0
3 years ago
The students at Midtown Middle school sold flowers as a fundraiser in September and October. In October, they charged $1.50 for
swat32
Let the price of flowers in September be x, then (100 + 20)/100 * x = $1.50
120/100 * x = $1.50
1.2x = $1.50
x = $1.50/1.2 = $1.25
The price of flowers in September is $1.25

Total money realised in September = $1.25 x 900 = $1,125
40% earned = 0.4 x $1,125 = $450

Total money realised in October = $1.50 x 700 = $1,050
40% earned = 0.4 x $1,050 = $420

The class earned more money in September and they earned $30 more than in October.
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jimmy gets a discount of 35% for a pair of sneakers whose original price is $70. He also gets a discount of 25% on a shirt whose
    10·2 answers
  • How many cubic centimeters is 5 cubic meters.
    6·2 answers
  • Question 6 of 10
    14·1 answer
  • A group of four components is known to contain two defectives. An inspector tests the components one at a time until the two def
    7·1 answer
  • A ladder (line segment AC in the diagram) is leaning against a wall. The distance between the foot of the ladder and the wall (B
    5·1 answer
  • OMG plz help me. IDK how to do thisI need help asap
    15·1 answer
  • 1 Select the correct answer. Kalid simplified a polynomial expression as shown. (6x3 + 8x2 − 7x) − (2x2 + 3)(x − 8) step 1 (6x3
    8·1 answer
  • THere are 60 dogs in the park. 20% of them are golden retrievers. How many golden retrievers are there in the park? Use a propor
    14·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Part A: Create a fifth-degree polynomial with four terms in standard form. How do you know it is in stand
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me lol a lil confused
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!