Answer:
Juliet is not allowed to associate with Romeo because he is a Montague. If he had any other name it would be fine. She’s complaining that his name is meaningless. If the rose had any other name it would still be the same. So with Romeo; he would still be the same beautiful young man even if he had a different name. “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” Juliet knows that the blood feud prevents her from loving a Montague. She ponders it. It’s only your name that’s the enemy. You are what you are, even though you may be a Montague. What’s ‘Montague’? It isn’t hand or foot or arm or face or any other part belonging to a man. Oh I wish you had a different name. What is so special about a name? A rose, even if it were called something else, would smell just as sweet. So Romeo would still have all the perfection that he has, even if he were not called Romeo. Romeo, take off your name and in exchange for that whole name, which is not really a part of what you are, you can have all of me.
Answer:
Explanation:
The answer is C. The first step in the reading strategy is to read carefully for information.
Answer:
Logical Fallacies. Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim.
Explanation:
hope this helped
Answer:
not very relevant
Explanation:
the american mindset is that most people want to be famous or rich (henceforth the idea of hollywood it is just a name but the fact that we think of rags to riches) so in my view some one who would say that would be someone who already has it all
but some one who would deny whould be some one with a bhuddist background as they are not focused on the material world
Farce is the correct answer I believe. Hope it helps
<span />
