Answer:
b) Heightened global competition
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that working as a distributor of an automative part i.e. based on the Ohia diversifies its business operations in China. Also the employees and the management are working with this division and taking the classes on the chinese culture and their customs in order to feel comfortable
So this scenario represents that the global competition is on the peak
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer:
B. The Sherman Act allows the US government to regulate activities that restrain competition and trade
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was first legislation enacted by US congress. It was brought into force to regulate competition and trade among enterprises. This act prohibits agreement in restraint of trade or interference of power in trade like price fixing, bid rigging, etc.
The Sherman Act did not work for long as it restrict the business merger and people are confused about knowing the motive of the act as it is not designed properly.
Answer: Neo-Corporatism.
Explanation:
Neo- Corporatism emerged in resent times as a successor to State Corporatism. State Corporatism was a system whereby interest and labor groups were supposed to work together for the good of society. These were most prevalent in authoritarian regimes like Nazi Germany and post communist Lithuania.
Recently though, in some Democratic countries, interest groups have chosen to work with the Government to improve the lives of the people and enable the Government reach out deeper. These Peak Associations as they are often called help the Government compete economically and are very prevalent in countries and regions such as, Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Scandinavia.
Answer:
The correct choice is C)
The most logical thing to do would be to calculate the value of the stock in 5 years time.
Explanation:
This speaks to ones understanding of dividend growth stock valuation models. These tools are used to establish a fair value for a stock by discounting the present value of its future dividends. A commonly used model is the constant growth dividend discount model.
The formula for the DDM, which assumes constant growth in dividends, is provided below.
P0 = D1/(r-g)
Where,
P0 = intrinsic value of stock
D1 = dividend payment one year from today
r = discount rate
g = growth rate
Identifying the correct answer entails establishing a timeline of the expected cash flows. We are given the following information:
t0 = $0
t1 = $0
t2 = $0
t3 = $0
t4 = $0
t5 = $0.20
t6 = $0.20 * 1.035
Given a rate of return, we could use the constant growth dividend discount model to establish the fair value of the firm at t5 (five years from today). Incidentally, to determine today's value, we'd discount it back another five years.
Based on the information above, we are able to prove that the answer is '5'.
Cheers!
