Answer:
A. $50 increase
Explanation:
Basically there are three types of activities:
1. Operating activities: It includes those transactions which affect the working capital, and it records transactions of cash receipts and cash payments.
2. Investing activities: It records those activities which include purchase and sale of the fixed assets
3. Financing activities: It records those activities which affect the long term liability and shareholder equity balance.
The change in net cash provided by operation is shown below:
= Investment made - purchased goods on credit - paid amount
= $300 - $150 - $100
= $50
The answer is C, good luck!
This is the situation of countries like Germany,
Where exports > imports...
The results is definitely good for the country. It will increase its trade surplus. This allow the country to amassed a huge number of foreign reserves which they can use to invest abroad..
While countries that import > exports, will experienced trade loss/deficit (just think it like the reverse)
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
