Evans' rule says that if n = 50 you need at least 5 predictors to have a good model.

Câu hỏi em gửi trong hình ạ. Mong mn giúp đỡ

GaryK [48]

I Dont know hehehehe

6 0

3 years ago

Hugo Inc., a calendar year taxpayer, sold two operating assets this year. The first sale generated a $38,700 Section 1231 gain,

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

$20,700 ordinary loss

Explanation:

Based on the information given if the first Operating assets generated a gain of the amount of $38,700 while the second assets generated a loss of the amount of $59,400 after been sold out which indicate or means that Hugo should recognize the amount of $20,700 ORDINARY LOSS which is calculated as :

Ordinary loss =-$59,400+$38,700

Ordinary loss =-$20,700

Therefore As a result of these sales, Hugo should recognize:$20,700 ORDINARY LOSS

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium? An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their positi

amid [387]

The question is reconstructed below:

Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?

A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.

B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.

C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.

D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.

Answer:

D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.

Explanation:

Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.

8 0

3 years ago

How can a business deal with employees who have lack of focus and future goals ?

LenKa [72]

Answer:

motivation

Explanation:

Encourage them,make them see vision .

5 0

3 years ago

145. A mutual fund manager has a $40 million portfolio with a beta of 1.00. The risk-free rate is 4.25%, and the market risk pre

denpristay [2]

Answer:

1.763

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Beta of $40 million portfolio = 1

Risk-free rate = 4.25%

Market risk premium = 6.00%

Expected return = 13.00%

Now,

Expected return = Risk-free rate + ( Beta × Market risk premium )

13.00% = 4.25% + ( Beta × 6.00% )

or

Beta × 6.00% = 8.75%

or

Beta = 1.458

Now,

Beta of the total profile should be equal to 1.458

Thus,

Weight of $40 million portfolio = $40 million ÷ [ $40 million + $60 million]

= 0.4

Weight of $60 million portfolio = $60 million ÷ [ $40 million + $60 million]

= 0.6

therefore,

the average beta

1.458 = 0.4 × 1 + 0.6 × ( Beta of $60 million portfolio )

or

1.058 = 0.6 × ( Beta of $60 million portfolio )

or

Beta of $60 million portfolio = 1.763

5 0

3 years ago