Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
Answer:
◻DELS ~ ◻KARP is incorrect
Step-by-step explanation:
All of the similarity statements have corresponding letters in the same order except ...
◻DELS ~ ◻KARP . . . . (incorrect)
_____
The correct version would be ...
◻DELS ~ ◻KRAP
Hello!
When finding the perimeter of a rectangle, you have to consider the properties of a rectangle. A rectangle has two pairs of equal sides where one is the width, while the other one is the length.
Now looking back at your question, it says "... a rectangle that is x units wide" ⇒ you let the width = x ; this is the same with "y units long" ⇒ length = y. Perimeter can just be : P = 24.
Therefore,
The equation would be:
x + x + y + y = P.
2x + 2y = P.
(Sub in P = 24)
∴ 2x + 2y = 24. (This should be your answer.)
:) Good luck (Message me if you have any problem)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
÷
×
