Both authors of "In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" chose the same historical event as the setting but these books shows the World War 1 from two absolutely different points of view. "In Flanders Fields" author praises and blesses all those warriors who protected their native land fighted for it and its future generations. While reading this story you feel persuasive tone that aimed to make you feel the same. "Dulce et Decorum Est!" shows the most appalling things that happened during the War and urges us that if we had ever been through It all it would have been the worst nightmare in our life. To conclude : in the first story author eulogizes War whereas the second warns against it.
Answer:
whats the question, i'm sorry, i dont get it. ;-;
Explanation:
Answer:
4 she is using context clues (using given information to figure out the answer to another piece of information that is unknown)
The answer is D
Corrupted has a negative connotation, like distracted. “The present”=latest new. You is figurative; the author does not literally mean a toy, but a new thing.
Dash is the mark of punctuation that can indicate that more info is to come.
Hope this helped :)
