The floods in Mesopotamia improved the soil in the area, allowing for more widespread agriculture. Most of the soil in the region was salty and sandy and not suitable for farming. The floods brought silt, which made the soil fertile. The silt from the floods contained nutrients and minerals that helped crops to thrive.
How did flooding help and harm farmers in Mesopotamia?
How did the flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers both help and hurt farmers? They helped with fertile soil to help plant crops and they hurt them for flooding their crops. Floods were unpredictable.
A person belonging to the left-wing majority group of the Russian Social Democratic Worker's Party was called a "Menshevik" although it should be noted that there were varying degrees to this aspect of political association.
One thing that the Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) and the Compromise of 1850 had in common was that "<span>They both attempted to preserve the Union," since the only other option regarding the slavery issue was civil war. </span>
Answer:It effected The United States in many ways.
Explanation:Good ways and bad ways, bad because it made life difficult for people working in factories but good because it helped have more product availability for most people.