The answer is C. Add more information next time, some context lol
"Vague terror" is terror that has no clear cause; as such, it is all-encompassing.
Usually terror is directly caused by something. For example, someone might have a terror of heights, crowds, or spiders. In these situations, the source of one's terror is clear, and avoiding the trigger (heights, crowds, spiders) is generally easy to do.
If terror were to have a clear source, it could be easily defined (and therefore easily combatted). When terror is vague, however, it cannot be easily defined (and cannot be easily defeated). Therefore, "vague terror" is much worse.
It would be nice but unfortunately its impossible to do. Switzerland is one of the few countries in the world who has been able to pull off avoiding war but even they were close to being invaded by Hitler in WW2 even though they claimed to be neutral. If you make war inhumane & out law it you would also prohibit yourself to defend itself. There will always be war there will always be greed there will always be reasons one country finds to attack another & more often then not a smaller one at that but still there will always be war. banning war would be like saying you should have doors on your house because their made of wood that would ultimately invite crime to your house in some form or another while at the same time living you little option in stopping it when it came. You don't have to start a war to be pulled into it & any involvement would lead to or contribute to inhumane things. If german invaded Switzerland & they fought back it would take Germany longer to take over delaying the victory most predicted & extending the time civilians could be hurt or killed fighting. While if they roll over & gave up they'd end up like France who still suffered even after giving up. So either way they would have suffered & had inhumane things done.
Answer:
I suspend judgment in the matter and I suspend judgment on all other issues I have examined too."" ___ Didn't know if knowledge was possible.
Explanation:
- Pyrrhonists are those ones who follow the Pyrrho. He was a Greek philosopher who laid the foundation of skeptical thought known as pyrrhonism.
- In pyrrhonism, an individual accepts the knowledge as it appears without checking facts and doing any calculations.
- In given situation, it is said that I suspend judgment in the matter and on all other issues. It shows that that person is suspending judgment on every proposal so that person is Pyrrhonist.
<em><u>Question:</u></em> Write the sentences in negative.
<em><u>Answer:</u><u>-</u></em>
1. I dont study French
2. School does not finish at two o' clock.
3. You should not copy from other students.
4. We think English is not easy.
5. My friends doesnt play volleyball.
6. I dont watch TV on Saturday morning.
7. She doesnt speak Chinese.
8. The dogs doesnt like cats.
