Mainly to spread and practice their religion freely, but some also did it to make money, explore, and have land of their own.
Answer:
Dont overload the power, so dont have too many appliances running at the same time
Explanation:
While _(The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth)_ allowed some freedom of religion in the 1700s, _(Russia)_ attacked and took land away from Poland.
I think that these are two separate questions:
1) <span>According to research, one way women can advance in leadership is...I think that the biggest support for women in leading position is democracy so the answer is by leading in a democratic way
2) The best way to create change is to inspire it!
So it's best to </span>Become strong role models for their followers. -then their followers will participate in the change
Yes, it can. For example, if only one religion is allowed in a country, and if oficials of this religion have some power, but where people still have a say in the government, then it's a democracy and theocracy at the same time.
In a way, UK can be argued to be theocracy and democracy: its upper chamber of the parliament has many Lords Spiritual, which are Bishops of the Anglican Church, but the lower chamber is elected democratically.
