Answer:
Actor/observer bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the actor/observer bias refers to the tendency to attribute our own actions to external causes while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes.
When the results of a situation are negative, if the negative outcome happened to the person, the person will likely attribute the outcome to external circumstances. But when it comes to other people, the person will attribute the outcome to the other person behaviors, habits or actions.
In this example, Jeremiah falls and thinks the ice is brutal. <u>He is attributing the fall to an external circumstance (the ice)</u>. But then, when his friend Ed falls on the same spot, he says his friend is really clumsy, <u>attributing the fall to an inner characteristic of his friend</u>. Therefore, this would be an example of actor/observer bias.
They used it to teach Greek Virtues
All of the above are relevant factors to be evaluated for moral intensity except
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moral intensity is the intensity of feeling that a person has about the values of a moral choice.
- The magnitude of the consequences: This is the quantity of the evils forced on the victims of the decision.
- Social consensus: This is the point of social recognition that an act is either moral or sinful.
- Proximity: This is the sense of intimacy, either culturally, psychologically, or bodily, that the soul has for the victims of the act in question.
- The concentration of effect: This is an inverse function of the number of characters hit by an act of any given measure.
I Believe the answer is: <span>gender stratification
</span><span>gender stratification is created in a society where Men in general tend to be presented with more opportunities for education and specified job description.
When this happen, Men tend to acquire more chance to obtain more wealth which resulted in unequal balance of power and resources between men and women.</span>
