All categories

2 years ago

What is the significance of john marshall's ruling in marbury.

2 answers:

5 0

Answer:the U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

Explanation:

Zina [86]2 years ago

3 0

Explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

You might be interested in

Which were british field marshal bernard montgomery contributions.

Scrat [10]

C. He defeated the Axis armies of Italy and Germany at El Alamein, Egypt.

D. He defeated the German army at the Battle of the Bulge.

7 0

3 years ago

Help me plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

shtirl [24]

Need help with the answer

4 0

3 years ago

Below is a graph of the Murphys’ annual expenses. How much will the Murphys’ pay in state/local taxes if their gross annual hous

Free_Kalibri [48]

Hi sorry i just need points

6 0

3 years ago

In our own nation, the Boston Tea Party represented a massive act of civil disobedience. Why does King use this allusion? to est

Leni [432]

Answer:

Read the excerpt from “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In our own nation, the Boston Tea Party represented a massive act of civil disobedience. Why does King use this allusion? to establish historical precedent for his actions to commemorate a beloved American leader to appeal to his critics’ sense of moral justice to forge a connection with modern political figures

6 0

3 years ago

Frank, who lives in texas, and his sister lilly, who lives in japan, correspond regularly. From what he can tell from the postma

ehidna [41]

Answer:

(A) There is convincing evidence that there is no difference in the mean delivery times.

(B) There is convincing evidence that there is a difference in the mean delivery times.

(C) There is convincing evidence that the mean delivery time from Japan to Texas is greater than the mean delivery time from Texas to Japan.

(D) There is not convincing evidence that the mean delivery time from Japan to Texas is greater than the mean delivery time from Texas to Japan.

(E) The t-test cannot be used for sample sizes that are this small.

Explanation:

The correct option is;

(A) There is convincing evidence that there is no difference in the mean delivery times.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have the formula for the two-sample t-test given s;

To Texas N₁ = 12, =8.74 σ₁ = 2.92 SE Mean₁ = 0.84

To Japan N₂ = 9 = 6.75 σ₂ = 2.56 SE Mean₁ = 0.85

t = 1.667

Where the null hypothesis is

mu To Texas = mu To Japan and the alternative is

mu To Texas > mu To Japan

Here since the observed P value of P = 0.058 is greater than the significance level of 0.05 we fail to reject the null hypothesis and we will therefore, not accept the alternative hypothesis.

Hence, there is convincing evidence that there is no difference in the mean delivery times.

3 0

2 years ago