1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
allochka39001 [22]
2 years ago
8

PLZzzz helllpppp!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
Mumz [18]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

144 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
The line width used for semiconductor manufacturing is assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 0.5 micrometer and a st
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

There is a 0.82% probability that a line width is greater than 0.62 micrometer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma, the zscore of a measure X is given by

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X. The sum of the probabilities is decimal 1. So 1-pvalue is the probability that the value of the measure is larger than X.

In this problem

The line width used for semiconductor manufacturing is assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 0.5 micrometer and a standard deviation of 0.05 micrometer, so \mu = 0.5, \sigma = 0.05.

What is the probability that a line width is greater than 0.62 micrometer?

That is P(X > 0.62)

So

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

Z = \frac{0.62 - 0.5}{0.05}

Z = 2.4

Z = 2.4 has a pvalue of 0.99180.

This means that P(X \leq 0.62) = 0.99180.

We also have that

P(X \leq 0.62) + P(X > 0.62) = 1

P(X > 0.62) = 1 - 0.99180 = 0.0082

There is a 0.82% probability that a line width is greater than 0.62 micrometer.

3 0
3 years ago
Round 46,750 to the nearest thousand.
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

47,000

Step-by-step explanation:

6,750 rounds up to 7,000

5 0
2 years ago
Which statement best explains the value of 17 - (-3)?
djverab [1.8K]

B) the additive inverse of -3 is +3, so 17-(-3) = 20 is your answer.

Remember, two negatives = one positive, and so:

- (-3) = 3

17 + 3 = 20

Therefore, B is your answer

hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
100 points and brainliest for correct answer!
dusya [7]
City C (42 and 66 are the two modes they are the most frequent numbers both appearing 3 times)
4 0
2 years ago
What is the answer to
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:_______________________________________________

-0.5

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which problem does this model of the solar system solve?
    8·2 answers
  • A rectangular deck has a length of 18 feet and a width of 16 feet. If a hot tub takes up a square that is 4 feet on each side in
    5·1 answer
  • I really need help in math! Any is appreciated!
    5·1 answer
  • Which equation is related to 58 = x + 25?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the equivalent radical expression for the exponential expression below? 71/2
    12·1 answer
  • How many commuters must be randomly selected to estimate the mean driving time of Chicago commuters? We want 90% confidence that
    14·2 answers
  • What is 55 divided by 11 + 7 x(2+14)
    8·1 answer
  • A 23 ft pixie stick is leaned up against a can of Monster. The bottom of the pixie stick makes a 31 degree angle with the ground
    12·1 answer
  • Draw a conclusion as to why zero students had a 54-inch shoelace
    13·2 answers
  • How do you write 0.16 repeating as a fraction
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!