Answer:
C. disposing of long minus lived assets for non cash proceeds
Explanation:
As we know that
Cash flow statement deals with the cash inflow and cash outflow of cash payments which increase or decrease the cash balance.
In another words, the inflow of cash increases the cash balance whereas the outflow of cash is decreases the cash balance
It includes operating activities, investing activities, and the financing activities.
Since all the given options includes the cash transactions except c.
The law of diminishing marginal returns holds for a situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.
<h3>What is the law of
diminishing marginal returns?</h3>
The law of diminishing marginal returns states that after some optimal level of capacity is reached in a production process, an additional factor of production would result in a lessening of output (quantity of production).
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that the law of diminishing marginal returns would only hold for an economic situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.
Read more on diminishing marginal returns here: brainly.com/question/13767400
#SPJ1
What happen bro I’ll take to. You add me on snap Jonbarro43
Answer:
a. $2,465.82
b. $3,539.68
c. Yes, we should
Explanation:
Annual cost to maintain old forklift is $5,000
Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) of new forklift = (Asset price x discount rate)/(1-(1+discount rate)-n), in which n is the number of year for usage of this forklift?
If discount rate is 4% per year, the EAC of new forklift is $2,465.82
= ($20,000x4%)/(1-(1+4%)-10)
If discount rate is 12% per year, the EAC of new forklift is $3,539.68
= ($20,000x12%)/(1-(1+12%)-10)
We should replace because with such above discount rate, the old forklift is more costly than the new one
Answer:
The higher an investment’s risk, the HIGHER THE RETURNS AN INVESTOR WILL REQUIRE.
Explanation:
By saying that investors are risk averse, it means that given a similar level of returns, an investor will choose the investment with the lowest risk. That is why investors generally prefer and are willing to pay more for less risky investments, which results in lower returns (higher price ⇒ lower returns).
So high risk investments will always have a lower price than low risk investments, since the returns demanded by investors are proportional to the risk of the investment.
