1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ghella [55]
3 years ago
15

On March 15, a fire destroyed Sheridan Company's entire retail inventory. The inventory on hand as of January 1 totaled $5900000

. From January 1 through the time of the fire, the company made purchases of $2032000, incurred freight-in of $242000, and had sales of $4140000. Assuming the rate of gross profit to selling price is 20%, what is the approximate value of the inventory that was destroyed
Business
1 answer:
likoan [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the approximate value of the inventory that was destroyed is $4,862,000.

Explanation:

Use the Gross Profit percentage to find the value of the inventory that was destroyed.

Sales                                                          $4,140,000

Less Cost of Goods Sold

Opening Inventory          $5,900,000

Add Purchases                $2,032,000

Add Freight In                     $242,000

Available                            $8,174,000

Less Inventory Lost         ($4,862,000)

Cost of Sales                                             (3,312,000)

Gross Profit at 20%                                    $828,000

Conclusion :

The Value of  inventory that was destroyed is $4,862,000.

You might be interested in
PROBLEMThe PQ partnership has the following plan for the distribution of partnership net income (loss):P QSalaries $60,000 $100,
Yanka [14]

Answer:

1. P = $156,560; Q = $203,440

2. P = $90,320; Q = 149,680

3. P = -$43,500; Q = $3,500

Explanation:

The explanation is given in images for each situation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Big Black Bird Company (BBBC) has a large order for special plastic-lined military uniforms to be used in an urgent military
kap26 [50]

Answer:

A. Multifactor productivity

Original Value of output 2500 un. x $200/un. = $500,000 Value of input 2500 un x $120/un. = $300,000 Multi-factor productivity $500,000/$300,000 = 1.67 Overtime Value of output 4000 un. x $200/un. = $800,000 Value of input 4000 un. x $144/un. = $576,000 Multi-factor productivity $800,000/$576,000 = 1.39 Multi-factor productivity (1.67 – 1.39) / 1.67 = 16.8% decrease

B. LABOR PRODUCTIVITY

Original Value of output 2500 un. x $200/un. = $500,000 Input = (100 people x 40 hr/person) = 4000 hours Labor productivity $500,000/4000 hr = $125/hr Overtime Value of output 4000 un. x $200/un. = $800,000 Input = (100 people x 72 hr/person) = 7200 hours Labor productivity $800,000/7200 hr = $111/hr Labor productivity ($125/hr – $111/hr) / $125/hr = 11.1% decrease

C.GROSS PROFITS

Original $500,000 - $300,000 = $200,000 Overtime $800,000 - $576,000 = $224,000

$24,000 increase

5 0
3 years ago
Jeff believes in the principle of rights theory and uses it to make ethical decisions for his business. He must decide whether t
Anika [276]

Answer:

D. How his decision will affect the rights of his employees, his consumers, and others.

3 0
3 years ago
If total change in cash = $44,000, net operating cash flows = $22,000, and net investing cash flows = ($13,000); then net financ
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

Net financing cashflows are $ 35,000.

Explanation:

A company generates cashflow from three activities that are cash from operations , cash from financing activities and cash from investing activities. The company net cash flow is total of these above specified. So we can determine net financing cashflows from the equation given below.

<em>total change in cash = net operating cash flows + net investing cash flows + net financing cash flows</em>

net financing cash flows = $ 35,000

<em />

<em />

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose there is a policy debate over whether the United States should impose trade restrictions on imported ball bearings:
Margarita [4]

Answer:

D. National security argument.

Explanation:

Looking at the options, the correct one is National security argument. This is because the congress woman is arguing that ball bearing industry is important in making weapons which is in turn very important to national security. She argues that imposing trade restrictions on free trade, it will make the United States begin to produce their own weapons which will be helpful in time of war when they need a lot of weapons.. Thus, her justification in her argument is primarily for National Security!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If we stare at a pattern for a sufficient amount of time our brains will answer
    9·1 answer
  • An earthquake destroys a major manufacturing plant that produces sneakers. the manufacturing plant for rubber, a complementary g
    6·1 answer
  • According to "The US Economy: Private and Public Sectors", goods provided by government that fit the definition of a public good
    5·1 answer
  • Helix Company has been approached by a new customer to provide 2,000 units of its regular product at a special price of $6 per u
    5·1 answer
  • How do loans and interest rates impact businesses?
    14·1 answer
  • Design capacity is the theoretical maximum output of a system in a given period under ideal conditions. True or false?
    12·1 answer
  • Rudy is looking at career options for his future. His parents will cover most of his living expenses while he prepares for his c
    5·1 answer
  • Indirect labor includes: (You may select more than one answer. Single click the box with the question mark to produce a check ma
    5·1 answer
  • If the Synyster Corp. has an ROE of 21 percent and a payout ratio of 20 percent, what is its sustainable growth rate?
    15·1 answer
  • Based on the information in the case, which of the following barriers and challenges to managing diversity that were identified
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!