Answer: Law of diminishing marginal utility
Explanation: In simple words, law of diminishing marginal utility states that as a consumer consume more of a good or service then the marginal benefit he or she receives from the additional consumption keeps on decreasing.
In the given case, Jenny's excitement keeps on decreasing with every chocolate she receives after a certain point of time.
Hence we can conclude that the given case illustrates law of diminishing marginal utility.
Answer: On Monday, Jan. 17, which would have been White’s 100th birthday, fans honored her legacy by donating $5 each to animal rights groups for what has been dubbed the #BettyWhiteChallenge. The challenge was a massive success, with hundreds of thousands of dollars raised for shelters, zoos, and animal rights organizations across the country.
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
While working on the project, Martha is most likely to be bored and less creative than usual.
Specialisation is an economic theory that suggests a person carries out activities for which one has a comparative advantage in or is most efficient in. For example, Martha is skilled in web design, economic theory would suggest that she specialises in Web design.
<u><em>Advantages of specialisation </em></u>
- The worker that carries out the same job function repeatedly becomes extremely skilled in the activity.
- Work is carried out faster.
<u><em>Disadvantages of specialisation </em></u>
- Work can become monotonous
- Employees skills in other job functions declines.
If a person carries out the same rudimentary task repeatedly, it is likely that the individual would become bored. For example, if an engineer is employed to put marbles in a box. Soon he would become bored because the work he is doing is not mentally stimulating.
A similar question was answered here: brainly.com/question/14898213?referrer=searchResults
Hello There! The Answer to this problem is: B, C, E, G
Explanation:
Answer: False
Explanation:
The contract is such that Molly agreed to bring bracelets if Jean would pay for said bracelets.
The terms of the contract therefore are that Jean would pay and Molly would deliver. Jean then calls Molly and says that they will be unable to pay which means that they are not going to be able to hold up their responsibilities in the contract.
Molly has the right to then cancel the contract because the other party will not be able to perform their obligations and face no repercussion for it.
