Answer:
The President and American Capitalism since 1945 describes the many ways presidential actions have affected the development of capitalism in the post–World War II era. Contributors show how, since Harry S. Truman took office in 1945, the American “Consumer-in-Chief ” has exerted a decisive hand as well as behind-the-scenes influence on the national economy. And, by extension, on the everyday lives of Americans.
The Employment Act of 1946 expanded presidential responsibility to foster prosperity and grow the economy. However, the details and consequences of the president’s budget often remain obscured because of the budget’s size and complexity, perpetuating an illusion that presidents matter less than markets. Essays in this volume highlight the impact of presidential decisions on labor, gender discrimination, affirmative action, poverty, student loans, and retirement planning. They examine how a president can influence the credit card economy, the rebuilding of postindustrial cities, growth in the energy sector and the software industry, and even advances in genetic engineering. They also look at how economic gains in one particular area can have ramifications in other areas. National defense strategies have led to the privatization of weapons acquisition and the development of the modern research university to create a defensive brain trust among citizens. Policies aimed at supporting competitive American businesses—for example, in the biotech field—also affect the environment.
This book is an important contribution to the history of capitalism, articulating how the president—by supporting policies that promote business growth in all sectors—has helped domestic companies expand internationally and added to a global image of the United States that is deeply intertwined with its leading corporations.
Mark H. Rose, professor of history at Florida Atlantic University, is coauthor of Interstate: Highway Politics and Policy since 1939. Roger Biles, professor of history emeritus at Illinois State University, is the author of The Fate of Cities: Urban America and the Federal Government, 1945-2000.
Answer:
it is quickly absorbed into the bloodstream
Baker, Schultz, and Halstead argue that the united states could exploit significant strategic and economic gains if it invests in cleaner energy technologies and supports international efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
The statement is false.
According to early projections from the US Energy Information Administration, cleaner renewable energy accounted for around 12.6% of total primary energy consumption and about 19.8% of domestically produced power in the US in 2020.
The policy, which was based on an economic model created by Resources for the Future, would cut carbon emissions by 50% by 2035.
The Council, which was established in 2017 by Ted Halstead, former Republican Secretaries of State James Baker and George Shultz, has put together a coalition of businesses, environmental organisations, economists, and other individuals to advocate their climate plan.
The complete question is:
Baker, schultz, and halstead argue that the united states could exploit significant strategic and economic gains if it invests in cleaner energy technologies and supports international efforts to reduce carbon emissions. True or false?
To Learn more about Cleaner energy, here
brainly.com/question/23903612
#SPJ4
y