Answer:
Contract manufacturing.
Explanation:
A domestic firm may decide to contract for the production of its goods by established foreign manufacturer. Such private-label manufacturing by a foreign company is called contract manufacturing.
Contract manufacturing involves the process of outsourcing a company's manufacturing business, such that a foreign company engages in the production of a private-label product which are then primarily marketed or distributed by a domestic company under its own brand name.
This ultimately implies that, it is a manufacturing process which involves the production of goods by a company under the brand name of another company.
In my case, I know from experience and heredity that for example my father died of a second heart attack at least partly because of his high cholesterol. The high cholesterol was related to his high metabolism so that he ate a lot of eggs and bacon when young so that probably produced a lot of bad cholesterol. Myself I also have a tendency to high cholesterol and was warned by my dad's doctor to watch it so consequently I mostly avoid dairy products and egg yolk and beef (red meat) and am mostly able to control it that way with diet so haven't had a heart attack yet.
Answer:
this is the community his work about the system so he cannot ans this question sorry
Answer:
The amount should be recorded as interest expense in the journal entry made each six months is $6,000
Explanation:
In order to calculate the amount should be recorded as interest expense in the journal entry made each six months, we have to calculate the interest annually with the following formula according to the given data:
interest annually=Issue Price of Bond×rate of interest
=$200,000
×6%
=$12,000
Therefore, the interest semiannually would be calculated as follows:
interest semiannually=$12,000/2=$6,000
The amount should be recorded as interest expense in the journal entry made each six months is $6,000
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
