Answer:
The asset turnover is 1.44 and return on assets is 0.37%
Explanation:
Average Total assets
Assets in the beginning $24,590
Assets at the end $23,300
Average assets $23945
Sales $34,450
Divide: Average assets $23945
Assets turnover ratio 1.44
Net Income $89
Divide: Average assets $23945
Return on assets 0.37%
Therefore, The asset turnover is 1.44 and return on assets is 0.37%
Answer:
D. A limited liability company because he will only be liable for what he has invested in the business. His personal assets will be protected, and he can be taxed like a sole proprietorship.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option D (Financial distress and agency costs).
Explanation:
- A cost of an agency is a form of company's internal expense that comes from an employee working on behalf of action of the principle. Agency costs usually occur from core redundancies, confusion, and delays, such as shareholder and management conflicts of interest.
- Distress expense applies to the expenses that a financially distressed company faces beyond the business cost, such as increased capital expenses. Troubled companies tend to have a tougher time fulfilling their financial responsibilities, which turns into a higher chance of default.
- When evaluating the company's value as a feature of market structure, the present value of the tax shield gain is balanced by the current value of the anticipated financial distress and agency expenses, which results in an ideal internal market structure.
Therefore, Option C is the right answer.
Answer:
the average collection period for accounts receivables is 41.2 days
Explanation:
Average Collection Period measures the amount of time it takes to collect credit from accounts owing.
Average Collection Period = Average Accounts Receivables / (Sales/365)
=(($27600+ $56400)/2) / ( $372000/365)
= $42,000/1019.178082
= 41.20967742
= 41.2 days
The audit expectation gap is caused by unrealistic user expectations. The auditors provides reasonable gap examples that would not be included in unrealistic user expectations.
NASBA believes the expectancy gap relating to fraud and going problems in a financial statement audit may be caused by a few factors: lack of knowledge by way of the general public as to what an audit is and what auditors do; inconsistent audit execution in these regions by some auditors due to lack of expertise.
The expectation hole exists while auditors and the public keep distinct beliefs about the auditors' obligations and obligations and the messages conveyed by way of audit reports. apparently, there's an opening between what the public expects and what it virtually receives.
Learn more about auditors here: brainly.com/question/26048609
#SPJ4
