Answer:
direct channel of distribution
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the student selling the cupcakes would be an example of a direct channel of distribution. This term refers to the means by which a company or business gets it's product straight to the consumer with-ought the use of intermediaries. Therefore since the student made the cupcakes and sold them himself he is the direct channel of distribution.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
No one should ever designate an inexperienced anything (e.g. engineer, accountant, salesman, etc.) to estimate a budget or an activities schedule. Usually people that estimate any kind of activity, should at least have some experience doing that activity, so that they know what is normal or achievable in a reasonable time.
The market structure of the producer will be described as ''Perfect Competition".
As in perfect competition, there are homogenous goods or products from different sellers involved in the market. While monopoly completion also involves many sellers but the products in the market are differentiated (non-homogenous).
Undifferentiated or homogenous goods are less effective on the market as there are too many sellers in the market. Due to that in the above condition a producer is producing the respective goods on a smaller level.
So, he will not affect the market and this clearly shows that the market is perfectly competitive by structure.
For more content like Market Competitions this visit:
brainly.com/question/9311576
#SPJ4
Answer: A. improved computer security programs
Lots of people lose money due to phone fraud scammers. They try to approach the target to sell improved computer security programs. They do lots of ways to convince you to the point of asking you to give personal information. If you happen to meet one, say no.
Answer: $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.
Explanation:
If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:
= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= $115 billion ÷ 0.25
= $115 billion × 1/0.25
= $115 billion / 0.25
= $460 billion.
Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator
