1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
den301095 [7]
3 years ago
14

Close Reading: According to Ward, why didn't voters in the assemblies have as much power as the magistrates or Senate?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Lena [83]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Alan Ward argues that voters in the Roman assemblies were effectively disenfranchised because all votes were held in Rome, only elite members of tribes were allowed to vote, and candidates were chosen by the higher levels, not the assemblies.

if it works please mark me as brainliest

You might be interested in
What does the word “democracy” mean in Greek?
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

The word 'democracy' has its origins in the Greek language. It combines two shorter words: 'demos' meaning whole citizen living within a particular city-state and 'kratos' meaning power or rule. A belief in shared power: based on a suspicion of concentrated power (whether by individuals, groups or governments). - the internets description. word democracy describes a form of government. The word comes from two Greek words that mean “rule by the people.” In a democracy the people have a say in how the government is run. They do this by voting, though there are usually rules about who can vote. Democracies are different from dictatorships. - my description

Explanation:

Greek democracy created at Athens was direct, rather than representative: any adult male citizen over the age of 20 could take part, and it was a duty to do so. The officials of the democracy were in part elected by the Assembly and in large part chosen by lottery in a process called sortition.

6 0
3 years ago
What term describes the failure of people from different cultures to
mash [69]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One criticism of equilibrium theory is that it does not explain widespread social change within or between societies. Please sel
Elan Coil [88]

Yes, it is true that the equilibrium theory of social change does not explain widespread social change within or <u>between societies.</u>

<h3>What is the equilibrium theory of social change? </h3>

The <em>equilibrium theory </em>explains the likelihood of the social system to again reach a <u>state of balance</u> when any change occurs in the society. Hence, the internal and external <em>relationship</em> between social elements is maintained.

Therefore, the social changes in different societies could not be measured as the equilibrium measures the social forces of a given society only.

Learn more about social theories here;  

brainly.com/question/4123668

8 0
2 years ago
What are the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress
coldgirl [10]

Answer: The intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements

(1) The defendant must act intentionally or recklessly.

(2) The defendant's conduct must be extreme and outrageous:

(3) The defendants act is the cause of the distress

(4) Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct.

Explanation:

Intentional or reckless act: It is not necessary that an act be intentionally offensive. A reckless disregard for the likelihood of causing emotional distress is sufficient.

Extreme and outrageous conduct:

The conduct must be horrible and beyond the standards of civilized decency or utterly intolerable in a civilized society. Whether the conduct is illegal does not determine whether it meets this standard.

Cause of the distress: The actions of the defendant must have actually caused the plaintiff's emotional distress beyond the bounds of decency.

Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct: This standard is quantified by the intensity, duration, and any physical manifestations of the distress.

7 0
3 years ago
Imagine that eye color in cats is controlled by a single gene and that there are two alleles: black eyes and orange eyes. All th
amid [387]

Answer:

dominant to                  

Explanation:

The answer is "dominant to".

                    When two things are combine or put into reaction and the result of the combinations shows mainly the constituents of one thing only surpassing the other thing, then that things which excels or is in greater proportion is said to be dominated.

                  Since the cross offspring of a black-eyed cat and an orange-eyed cat have black eyes, the allele for black eyes is said to be dominating the allele for orange eyes.

Thus the answer is "dominant to".

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is America... what is justice...
    15·1 answer
  • Who would be allowed to vote in a Democratic Party closed primary? all registered Democrats and Republicans only registered Repu
    12·1 answer
  • Before the American Civil War, Irish Americans, most of them working-class, opposed the Emancipation Proclamation and the freein
    6·1 answer
  • What is the term that means developing an emotional dependency with the abuser and the abuser's problem(s) to the point of self-
    11·1 answer
  • Please answer I am begging!
    10·1 answer
  • please help me!! DUE TOMORROW. Q- why are Hindu-Muslim conflicts in south Asia so significant to the history of the region. in a
    14·1 answer
  • The transition from the _____ stage to the _____ stage of the customer relationship requires the development of trust. Customers
    9·1 answer
  • What part of a literature review that defines the central problem or the focused research question
    12·1 answer
  • Atentar contra los derechos fundamentales del honbre se considera violacion do los derechos humanos
    6·1 answer
  • To help prevent mildew store equipment in a sealed container before it dries.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!