Answer:
to set example to those who'd commit the crime
Explanation:
Answer:
With containerization, all goods are loaded onto the same container that travels around the world as if it were one single piece. Therefore, the exporter can hire a series of interconnected services (truck, ship, train); all prepared to load and unload the container and easily transport it from one place to another.Containerisation has been a catalyst for globalisation. By lowering the costs of trade containerisation has encouraged specialisation and the expansion of global supply chains. Hope it helps (Brainliest please)
Explanation:
The Tang rulers established a system of coinage. This was an accomplishment by the Tang Dynasty of China.
The system of coinage began in Tang dynasty and continued its existence in the succeeding dynasties.
Kai Yuan Tong Bao was written in character on the coin currency circulated all throughout China beginning on the Tang dynasty. <span>Kai Yuan Tong Bao's size, weight and the accordance of name with the form made it not only the main currency of the Tang Dynasty but also the norm of the coin in the next dynasties</span>.
Since it was minted during the Tang dynasty, it was used without discontinuity. Its usage even extended to the collapse of the Tang dynasty. This form of money was used for 1300 years before replaced by Hong Xian Tong Bao.
Plessy was a citizen who claimed to be seventh eights Caucasian and only one eighth Black. He was imprisoned and trial in a criminal court after an incident that took place while in New Orleans, in 1896, when he tried to board a car designated for hite people. He was denied a seat in the car for white people and urged to take a seat in the car for black people. As Plessy refused on the basis of his predominantly Caucasian race, the train staff arrested him, and then he was put in the parish jail. He was charged with criminal counts, but Plessy requested his case to be presented to the Supreme Court for he deemed there had been violations of the Thirteen and Fourteenth Amendments (abolition of slavery and equal treatment).
The Supreme Court's opinion stated that the treatment based on "equal but separated" did not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, for this amendment only protected citizens from being enslaved or forced to involuntary servitude, and no conflict was found with the Fourteenth Amendment since it enforced equality, but it did not specify under which terms. Therefore, the decision of the Supreme Court supported the doctrine "equal but separate" and segregation as well.
