Answer:
I believe its the 3rd one
Explanation:
hope it's right!
Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
"republic of virtue" by means of what came to be known as the<span> Reign of Terror.</span>
Well the class structure was lords then samurais then farmers. How it stabilized society was it set a strict code to follow for each of the classes and they followed that. How it unified? I'm not so sure but my guess is that every person in each class fought for their power like the lords or for their land like the farmers.
The answer to this question is:
"doesn't require a quorum."
Your Welcome :)
