<span>You have 20 days to file a motion to request a hearing for a violation of the TABC. If the motion is denied, the permitee then has 30 days to file an appeal. The District Court then has 10 days to set the date for the hearing for the appeal.</span>
Answer:
Customer and Product Margin under Activity-based Costing and Traditional Costing
True Statements:
1. If a customer orders more frequently, but orders the same total number of units over the course of a year, the customer margin under activity based costing will decrease.
2. If a customer orders more frequently, but orders the same total number of units over the course of a year, the product margin under a traditional costing system will be unaffected.
Explanation:
Customer Margin is the difference between the total revenue generated from a customer minus the acquisition and service costs. In the above instance, the customer margin decreases because of the costs of servicing the customer's frequent orders. Customer service costs are usually higher with more frequent orders, when activity-based costing is employed because frequent orders increase the activity level and the associated costs.
Product Margin is the profit margin generated per product. It is the markup on the cost of the product. It shows the difference in amount between the selling price and the manufacturing cost. Frequent orders cannot change the product margin under the traditional costing technique unlike it does with the activity-based costing technique.
Answer: 592.614
Explanation:
She should spend 592.614 on wants because 592.614 is 30% of 1975.38
Answer:
b.the statement is invalid because the nominal
Explanation:
pa brainliest po
Answer:
$6 per unit
Explanation:
using the weighted average method:
units completed 92,000 x 100% (both materials and conversion)
ending work in progress 24,000
- materials 90% completed = 21,600
- conversion 40% completed = 9,600
equivalent unit conversion costs = total conversion costs / total equivalent units of conversion
- total conversion costs = $20,320 + $15,240 + $$182,880 + $391,160 = $609,600
- total equivalent units of conversion = 92,000 + 9,600 = 101,600
equivalent unit conversion costs = $609,600 / 101,600 units = $6 per unit
