The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Answer:
I think the answer is B)major
Explanation:
hope this helps if not let me know have a blessed day
The probability that students who were randomly selected studied for the test, if they pass it with a B or higher grade is: D. 0.80.
<h3>How to calculate the probability?</h3>
In this exercise, you're required to determine the probability that students who were randomly selected studied for the test, if they pass it with a B or higher grade. Thus, we would apply Bayes's theorem.
- Let S represent studied for.
- Let B represent a score of B or higher grade
Therefore, we need to find P(S|B):
S|B = 0.80.
Read more on probability here: brainly.com/question/25870256
#SPJ1
<u>Complete Question:</u>
At the beginning of the semester, a professor tells students that if they study for the tests, then there is a 55% chance they will get a B or higher on the tests. If they do not study, there is a 20% chance that they will get a B or higher on the tests. The professor knows from prior surveys that 60% of students study for the tests. The probabilities are displayed in the tree diagram.
The exercise is related to the Ratio Test for Convergence. The rules for this kind of test are given below.
<h3>What are the rules for Ratio Test for Convergence?</h3>
The rules are:
- If the limit is less than 1 when conducting the ratio test, your series is definitely convergent.
- The test is inconclusive if the limit is equal to 1.
- The series is divergent if the limit is greater than 1.
Using this knowledge, we are able to state that
- A is not conclusive.
- C's convergence is absolute.
- There is divergence with D and E.
- B and F appear to be employing the nth-term test. The nth-term involves determining the sequence's limit as it approaches infinity.
The nth-term test determines whether a series is divergent if the limit is bigger than 0, thus, both B and F are divergent series.
Please see the attached for the full question and the link below for more about Ratio Test for Convergence:
brainly.com/question/16618162
Answer:
A
Explanation:
.............................
