A postsecondary school that does not have a set of admission requirements such as a minimum GPA or test scores is called a(n):

Matt inherited as a trust a fifteen-year annuity-immediate with annual payments. He has been told that the annuity payments earn

Pavel [41]

Answer:

effective annual interest rate = 6.32%

annual payment = $1,585

Explanation:

I believe that this is an ordinary annuity, so we can use the future and present value of an ordinary annuity formula:

FV = annual payment x FV annuity factor, so annual payment = FV / FV annuity factor

PV = annual payment x PV annuity factor, so annual payment = PV / PV annuity factor

we can equal both equations:

PV / PV annuity factor = FV / FV annuity factor

FV / PV = FV annuity factor / PV annuity factor

$37,804.39 / $15,077.10 = FV annuity factor / PV annuity factor

2.5074 = FV annuity factor / PV annuity factor

the easiest way to solve this is to use an annuity table since we already know that there are 15 periods (I used an excel spreadsheet):

%,15 periods FV annuity factor PV annuity factor FV/PV

1 16.097 13.865 1.1609

2 17.293 12.849 1.34586

3 18.599 11.938 1.55797

4 20.024 11.118 1.80104

5 21.579 10.380 2.07890

6 23.276 9.7122 2.3966

7 25.129 9.1079 2.7590

8 27.152 8.5595 3.1721

9 29.361 8.0607 3.6425

10 31.772 7.6061 4.4112

The interest rate must be between 6 and 7%:

%,15 periods FV annuity factor PV annuity factor FV/PV

6 23.276 9.7122 2.3966

6.1 23.45404 9.6461 2.43145

6.2 23.63369 9.5858 2.46549

6.3 23.81491 9.52467 2.50034

6.31 23.83312 9.51851 2.50387

6.32 23.85135 9.51236 2.5074

6.4 23.99773 9.46337 2.53585

effective interest rate = 6.32% per year

annual payment = $37,804.39 / 23.85135 = $1,585

6 0

3 years ago

sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. he endorses the products and deposits his compe

Degger [83]

A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.

Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.

Learn more about minority popularity here:

brainly.com/question/14457086

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

Darren has borrowed $100$ clams from ethan at a $10\%$ simple daily interest. meanwhile, fergie has borrowed $150$ clams from ge

Oxana [17]

Answer:

20

Explanation:

start doing math

7 0

2 years ago

Which of the following actions would likely raise life insurance premiums?

Dafna1 [17]

Living a non-smoker its b

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose two countries, Country A and Country B, have a similar real GDP per capita. Country A has an average economic growth r

ozzi

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Many studies have found a positive correlation between economic growth and living standards. This means that empirical works have found that countries with higher economic growth, often have better living standards than the countries with less economic growth. In this case if real GDP per capita of both countries is similar, then they are comparable.

We can deduce that the country B will experience an increase in living standards much more rapidly in the long run because economic growth leads to an increase in profits for firms, there would be a better capital and labor return. This means that firms will pay more for capital and labor, if households are de owners of capital and labor, their rents and wages will increase. The disposable income will increase for households and they will consume more goods and services, then their living standards will increase.

7 0

3 years ago