In what context do you ask this question, and in relation to what country?
Answer:
The price of one share of such a stock today is $49.86
Explanation:
The stock's price today under the Dividend discount model can be calculated by discounting the expected future dividends to the present value using an appropriate discount rate. When the dividend growth becomes constant, we calculate the terminal value and discount it back too. The appropriate discount rate is the required rate of return. The worth of one of such stock today is,
V0 = 2.5 / (1+0.12) + 3.5 / (1+0.12)^2 + 4.5 / (1+0.12)^3 +
[4.5 * (1+0.04) / (0.12 - 0.04)] / (1+0.12)^3
V0 = $49.86
Answer:
C. It considers fixed manufacturing overhead cost as product costs.
Explanation:
The statement that is true of absorption costing is that it considers fixed manufacturing overhead cost as product costs.
Absorption costing uses the concept of cost drivers to ascertain the quantum of fixed manufacturing overhead cost a product generates, and ties that fraction to the product as its own cost.
By so doing, what would ordinarily have been periodic costs that will be apportioned among products become fixed costs that are directly traceable to those products.
The correct answer is Only (A) and (C) are true
Explanation:
In a study or research, the control group is the one that does not receive a treatment. This means, in this case, the control group includes those who only drink the green tea without the herbs because they serve as a standard to measure the effects of the herbs. This makes statement A (The "only green tea" group serves as the control group) true; also, the group receiving the herbs is the experimental group.
On the other hand, a double-blind study is one in which the researchers and the participants ignore who is receiving the treatment, which guarantees there is objectivity. This occurs in the study presented because neither the researcher nor the subjects known who received the herbal mix. Thus, statement C (This study is double-blind) is true.
Finally, a study is classified as observational if there is not intervention but the researchers just observe participants to study a phenomenon. This does not occur in the study presented because there is an intervention through the herbal treatment, and therefore the study is not observational.
