Answer:
1- Walmart wanted global expansion and it availed the opportunity to expand its business by entering Indian market, however the Indian market is far different than the US market that is why a joint-venture was required to enter the different market as Bharti Enterprises was already operating in Indian market.
2- To enter a new market Joint-venture will be suitable because:
In acquisition the investor acquires all the shares of an existing organisation in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost. In a Joint venture the investor and a local investor invests together to form a different organisation, in this method the organisations jointly own a newly formed organisation in which they both jointly decide the name and the local investor have knowledge about the local market which can be helpful if the customer taste is different than the investors market. In a Greenfield investment the investor purchases shares and bonds of an organisation already operating in the targeted market, in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost.
Explanation:
1- Walmart wanted global expansion and it availed the opportunity to expand its business by entering Indian market, however the Indian market is far different than the US market that is why a joint-venture was required to enter the different market as Bharti Enterprises was already operating in Indian market.
2- To enter a new market Joint-venture will be suitable because:
In acquisition the investor acquires all the shares of an existing organisation in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost. In a Joint venture the investor and a local investor invests together to form a different organisation, in this method the organisations jointly own a newly formed organisation in which they both jointly decide the name and the local investor have knowledge about the local market which can be helpful if the customer taste is different than the investors market. In a Greenfield investment the investor purchases shares and bonds of an organisation already operating in the targeted market, in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost.
Answer:
3X + 5Y = 100
Explanation:
Given that a consumer has $ 100 to spend on two goods X and Y with prices $ 3 and $ 5 respectively, the equation that represents this distribution is the following:
3X + 5Y = 100
Thus, the consumer may consume different combinations of products, as long as the sum of both amounts is $100 as a final result. For instance:
3x20 + 5X8 = 100
60 + 40 = 100
3x5 + 5x17 = 100
15 + 85 = 100
The benefits value of employees pay is 10- 20
Answer:
3.79 years
Explanation:
In the payback, we analyze in how many years the invested amount is recovered. The computation is shown below:
In year 0 = $117,200
In year 1 = $53,000
In year 2 = $21,500
In year 3 = $26,500
In year 4 = $20,500
In year 5 = $23,000
If we sum the first 3 year cash inflows than it would be $101,000
Now we deduct the $101,000 from the $117,200 , so the amount would be $16,200 as if we added the fourth year cash inflow so the total amount exceed to the initial investment. So, we deduct it
And, the next year cash inflow is $20,500
So, the payback period equal to
= 3 years + $16,200 ÷ $20,500
= 3.79 years
In 3.79 years, the invested amount is recovered.
Answer: Person who enjoys the benefits of a collective good, action, or service without any effort on their part.
Explanation:
In Economics, Free riders are people who benefit from resources and/or goods that are communal in nature and yet either do not pay or pay an insubordinate amount for enjoying same. Essentially they enjoy the benefits of a collective good without any effort on their part.
As a result, the good might become overused and degraded as it is not being maintained enough.
