Answer:
3000
1500
Explanation:
For each of the answers in this question I have added the formulas to solve them in the attachment below
1.
(45-39)*5*100
= 3000
2.
(45-39)-3 x5 x100
= $1500
<span>perhaps u want the formula for the percentage of markup, giving the cost and selling price.
..(selling price) = (cost) + (Markup)
..(selling price) - (cost) = (markup)
so,
..(markup)/(selling price)*100% = ((selling price) - (cost))/(selling price) * 100%
.. =(1 -(cost)/(selling price))*100%
</span>
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
Answer:c. Assume an additional 80 units of inventory will be required as safety stock. What will the new average inventory be? What will the new total carrying cost be?
Explanation:
Explanation:
There are two alternatives
1. Sold for $6,300
The inventory parts should be sold for $6,300 as the current inventory parts are not relevant as it is a sunk cost i.e $18,500
2. Repair and after that sale it
Now in this case, we have to determine the benefit generated i.e come from
= Sale value - repairing cost
= $19,700 - $9,100
= $10,600
As we can see that the alternative 2 generated higher benefit as compare to the alternative 1 so it would be more beneficial for the company
