Technology also has everything in between microchips , input methods and operating systems.
Answer:
"It burns the prettiest of any wood" is a phrase that, through allegory, focuses on the concept of equality, by establishing that everything that has the same characteristics will ultimately have the same result, since the intrinsic equal nature of things means that, despite minor differences, this difference is not seen in the essence of the thing. Thus, all those things that are essentially the same, such as wood, beyond their minor characteristics (beauty, for example) are equal to each other and therefore will burn in the same way.
Answer:
Biomes around the world, written by University of Chicago environmental scientists in 2018 for high school classes
Explanation:
This is the best option because the first option was written by a student on a blog and is therefore not as reliable as the second source.
The last two options do not talk directly about biomes, which is what the project is about, making them poor options as well.
The second source is reliable and pertains to the topic, making it the best choice.
Answer:
•The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.
Explanation:
Without transitions the argument will be unorganized. The reader will need to know how to follow along in a argument.
<3
Though Brutus’ speech was logical and concise and he thought that the crowd would rally to his cause, he failed to gain. Brutus was demanded the people to listen hear him. He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations. He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause. The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd.Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him. His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said. Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion. As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over. Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts.<span>
</span>
