Pop art started with the New York artists Andy Warhol, Roy Lichtenstein, James Rosenquist, and Claes Oldenburg, all of whom drew on popular imagery and were actually part of an international phenomenon. Following the popularity of the Abstract Expressionists, Pop's reintroduction of identifiable imagery (drawn from mass media and popular culture) was a major shift for the direction of modernism. The subject matter became far from traditional "high art" themes of morality, mythology, and classic history; rather, Pop artists celebrated commonplace objects and people of everyday life, in this way seeking to elevate popular culture to the level of fine art. Perhaps owing to the incorporation of commercial images, Pop art has become one of the most recognizable styles of modern art.
The answer would be D: all of the above
Answer:
Ancestral temples are natural areas of special spiritual significance to peoples and communities. They include natural areas recognized as sacred by indigenous and traditional peoples, as well as natural areas recognized by institutionalized religions or faiths as places for worship and remembrance. Access to these sites is usually restricted by taboos and management codes to particular activities and members of a community. Many sacred sites have survived for hundreds of years and act as important biodiversity reservoirs. However, their contribution to conservation has been largely overlooked and undervalued by state and conservation agencies, policies and laws. Sacred natural sites are also integral parts of ethnic identity and play a key role in traditional cultures and lifestyles. While community controls once helped protect sacred natural sites, rural peoples are increasingly vulnerable to political and economic pressures outside their control. Without security of tenure and active participation in decisions that affect them, it is impossible for such communities to effectively protect their lands and resources. taking that in mind I would advise to create protection laws with penalties if people dont respect them or start a global protest so the world know about this issue.
Hope I helped :)
Answer:
10,000
Explanation:
From the question, it can be deduced that $25,000 received for physical injury, and $60,000 received for his loss of income can be categorised as an expense. $10,000 received for punitive damages is the only form of earning. Hence the $10,000 gross income.
The answers to your question are,
Factory equipment was dangerous to operate, A typical work shift might be twelve to sixteen hours long, and There was little government regulation of workplaces.<span>
I hope this helps you!
</span>
