Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
The answer would be D) When the government doesn't protect their natural rights.
That statement is true
During the inflation, the strength of our currency is decreased, which will lead to lower investment that will come to our country.
This will cause an increase of unemployment and increasing price to match the previous currency
<h3>The Freedom Fighters of UAE are:-</h3><h3>1. Nasser bin Ghaith </h3><h3>2. Ahmed Mansoor </h3><h3>3. Fahad Salim Dalk </h3><h3>4. Hassan Ali Al Khamis </h3><h3>5. Ahmed Abdul Khaleq </h3>
Answer:
afforestation
inproper minning
overgrazing
Explanation:
one must pratices afforestation that is replaceing new ones after cutting them
2.
