When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
The last sentence “I was not conscious after my head hit the ground.” Is the correct answer. The person was “not aware” or knocked out after hitting their head.
Answer:
C: That an animal was not born in the wild.
Explanation:
Answer: They choked and died from fluid in their lungs..?
Explanation: I'm not quite sure if this is right but this is the only thing I could think of, I'm so sorry if it's wrong
