Answer: 70%
Explanation: There are two figures that add up to give us the answer:
Americans who use social networking program and are truly social = two thirds of 60% of American adults.
Americans who don't use social networking program and are truly social = 30% of American adults.
Americans who use social networking program and are truly social = 
X 60%
= 40%
Total poportion of US adults who characterize themselves as truly social = 40% + 30% = 70%
Answer:
Raising awareness and correcting others in the moment of the action are probably two of the biggest ways everyone can help when it comes to injustice and the constant fight for equality that the world faces. If you’re not the one facing the issue, confront those committing those injustices and aid those that are being affected. If you are head of a community/home/business etc, make sure that these injustices are not being made and that every day you and your community learn more about daily issues and how to actively solve them. Become active when it comes to government (especially to a local level, not only national), raise awareness of the issue and don’t turn a blind eye. If you are the one that has experienced inequality or injustice, speak up and do not be afraid to tell your story, because it is only when you take the blindfold off others that they can see what is happening. Protect your community and actively encourage others to raise their voice and be heard.
Explanation:
Answer:
a or D ...................
Answer:
The correct answer to: Patterns of Continuity and Change over Time using specific examples, analyze the extent to which the rise of capitalism presented a source of continuity or change between medieval and modern Europe.
Is:
True
Explanation:
why? well, patterns of continuity and Change over time are tools that combined provide us enough information to establish associations based on the variables observed. In our case, we would review the data whether it would be qualitative or quantitative. To establish an association of continuity or change over the two different systems and their respective dynamics. This all possible after understanding the data related to the different variables in the paradigm's dynamics. After observing the changes and continuity we would be able to deduct if the paradigm changed, provided a change or continuity. For example, we could say the following. In feudalism, the majority of wealth was held by the aristocrats. Then, we would come to nowadays data and find out that 10% o the people of the world possess more than 70% of the world's wealth and that from that 10% almost 60 to 70% have relationships with people in the international government. That suggests a continuity observable condition. However, if we consider that in feudalism not everyone had the chance to study medicine. While in recent times everyone can pursue medical studies. We could observe a change. So, in both cases qualitative and quantitative we can deduct or infer a certain continuity and change between both systems thanks to the patters data analysis of specific examples.
The 5 modes are Confronting, Compromising, Smoothing, Forcing, and Avoiding.
A systems approach to planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 5 modes for battle decisions are explained and the situations whilst they may be great utilized are identified.
- Those modes are Confronting, Compromising, Smoothing, Forcing, and warding off.
- 5 of the styles of battle in undertaking control are the imaginative and prescient of the assignment, institution differences, lack of communication, negative management, and disagreement on conflicts.
- Conflict decision involves the method of lowering, disposing of, or terminating of all bureaucracy and varieties of Conflict. five styles for battle management, as diagnosed by using Thomas and Kilmann, are: competing, compromising, participating, fending off, and accommodating.
Learn more about Compromising here: brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
