Answer:B It thought that unemployment was a greater problem than the rising inflation rate
Explanation:
Inflation is the continuous rise in price of goods and services which is as a result of large volume of money in circulation used for the few available goods and services.
Unemployment is a situation where all that are willing and capable of being employed are unable to get employment.
In the above scenario lowering Interest rates will increase the volume of money in circulation which will invariably increase inflation and we equally increase level of investment as the cost of fund will be cheaper thereby lowering unemployment.
This action means unemployment is of greater problem than rising inflation.
It does not mean inflation is of more concern than unemployment otherwise it will have increase the interest rate, it will make loanable fund demanded to exceed supply and the quantity of money in supply will increase.
Answer:
The answer is: She used the justice approach, realizing that the greater good is served because people learn to help each other in their own interest.
Explanation:
Justice approach: an ethical decision is a decision that distributes benefits and costs (or punishments) among those involved in a fair, equitable, and impartial way.
Paula used this approach because she believed the agents had acted improperly and that they were harming the US Secret Service.
I consider any organization a team, so in order for it to work well its members must be respected both by their peers and by the other teams´ members. If you consider the various types of activities this specific agency carries out, other not so friendly "teams" (other secret services or even terrorists) could use this type of information to damage or compromise those activities. So the well being of all the country was being jeopardized by a group of bad agents.
The better Project is Project S having a NPV of $17.968 and IRR of 12.10 %
IRR:
- An approach to capital budgeting that is used to assess the profitability of a project is the discounted payback time. Internal rate of return is one of these capital planning strategies (IRR).
- This rate of return corresponds to the point at which a project's net present value equals zero. Since it does not account for any outside forces, such as inflation, they call it internal.
The calculator's capabilities will be utilized to determine the IRR,
Project S
- CF0 = (1,000)
- CF1 = 882.62 & F01 = 1
- CF2 = 250 & F02 = 1
- CF3 = 15 & F03 = 1
- CF4 = 5 & F04 = 1
- I = 10.5%
- [NPV] [CPT]
- The NPV is $17.968
- [IRR] [CPT]
- The IRR will come as 12.10%
- Project L
- CF0 = (1,000)
- CF1 = 0 & F01 = 1
- CF2 = 260 & F02 = 1
- CF3 = 420 & F03 = 1
- CF4 = 732.87 & F04 = 1
- I = 10.5%
- [NPV] [CPT]
- The NPV is $15.78
- [IRR] [CPT]
- The IRR will come as 11.03%
- The better Project is Project S having a NPV of $17.968 and IRR of 12.10%
Learn more about IRR here brainly.com/question/7920964
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes, because the corporation remains liable to the owner under the contract
Explanation:
The above answer is true because in this case, there is no limit to the assignment of the contractual rights between the two parties, hence this assignment of a contract would be treated as both an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties.
Therefore, while the corporation in this case has delegated its duties and assigned its rights under the contract to the developer by assigning the contract to the developer, the corporation is still considered to be liable to the owner for payment of the purchase price.
And given the fact that the developer is not as creditworthy as the corporation, and thus there is a greater chance that the developer will be unable to pay the purchase price, the owner has the rights under the contract arrangement to contractually compel the corporation to do so.
Answer:
Hey mate....
subscribed already.....thx for points