Answer:
The characters, The God of Gods, and the events that follow all interact with each other and bring about some of the same themes from different civilizations when comparing and contrasting Genesis and Gilgamesh. Adam and Eve vs. Gilgamesh and Enkidu, Serpent vs. Humbaba, and Noah vs. Utnapishtim will be compared in the Genesis and Gilgamesh stories. Why did external factors, such as God or Gods or other characters, play a role in the results of the accounts to the primary characters? What was the message to be learned from accounts, and how do they differ from each other? Each character's perspective will be examined in detail, as will similarities and variances in character roles, external factors interaction with characters, key messages learned, and how those messages differ.
What are the similarities and differences between the Genesis and Gilgamesh accounts of Adam and Eve? God created the Earth and Heavens in seven days, as well as men. So “Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and no man to work the ground” when the Earth was created. (Genesis 2:5) Lord God summoned underground streams of water to irrigate the earth, and from the earth's dust, he made man. The guy came to life when God "breathed life into his nostrils" (Genesis Bible 2:7). When God created Adam, his responsibility was to till the ground that God had planted with his strength. “It is not good for a man to be alone,” the Lord God declared. I'll get him a helper." (Gen. 2:18 ) Lord God put Adam to sleep and used his ribs to create his servant. Eve was Adam's aide.
Explanation:
Is this enough or more is needed?
The central idea of the passage mentioned is the differences the Pilgrims had with the Church of England. It is how it is mentioned in the passage that their Englishmen forefathers where so religious that they devote their life unto the Lord if anything would have happened to them. The pilgrims in turn told that when the Lord heard them, He just looked over their adversity but did not specifically say if the Lord has ever helped them. It showed that the Pilgrims where furious about the loyalty to the Englishmen forefathers that they in turn do not want to believe what they believed in before. That they can do it without turning themselves to the traditional way of thinking.
Answer:
The correct answer is: O John packet the following for his trip: an umbrella, a blanket, a sleepeing bag, and a tarp.
Answer:
In “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King explains the purpose and effectiveness ofnonviolent direct actions through the concept of negotiations.For example, Kingmentions “direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that acommunity which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.”King believes that tension is a good thing and that it is what is needed for direct actionto take place. Nonviolent can get one’s point across with hopefully less repercussions. Inaddition, King pulls an example from Socrates to strengthen his argument about whynonviolent direct action is the most effective way to handle things. For example, Kingwrites “Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realmof creative analysis and objective appraisal, so we must see the need for nonviolentgadflies to create the kind tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depthsof prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood.”Once again, it is thought that tension is a good thing when it comes to a controversialissue. Without tension, there can be no discussion, and without discussion, there can beno progress.
Explanation:
kitchen because that’s like that right answr
