Answer:
b. objective
Explanation:
To say that someone is 'good' or 'strong' is not objective because it is based on your own values, perceptions and judgement. So, someone else might have a very different perception of those adjectives based on his own experience and values.
It's not objective, it's subjective, because it depends of the subject (individual) saying those words, on what they define is good, on what they believe is strong and so on.
Objective means it's something that everyone agrees on, that has a general consensus among the population. For example, saying someone is beautiful/handsome implies your own criteria of beauty, which may or may not be shared by others. But if you say someone is tall, then it can be measured and quantified to determine if it's really the case or not, it's not dependent on someone's opinion or feelings.
Answer:
1. Apollo promises he will give his son any gift but that of allowing him to drive the chariot.
2. Apollo tells his son that not even other gods can drive his chariot.
3. Apollo explains what will happen if his son drives his chariot.
4. Apollo reluctantly gives in to his son's request to drive the chariot.
Explanation:
When Phaethon went to his father the sun god- Apollo, to confirm his legitimacy, his father assured him that he was indeed his son. Awed by his father's magnificence and the sun-chariot, Phaethon made a request to drive the chariot when told by his father to make any request. Phaethon insisted on driving the chariot and since his father already gave his word, he could not go back on it.
Apollo initially resisted the idea and told his son to make another request. He explained that not even other gods like zeus could drive his chariot. He explained how the chariot worked and the dangers involved in it. When his son refused still insisted, he eventually had to keep his word by letting his son drive the chariot.
<em>Answer:</em>
Why am I reading this?
What's my reading plan?
What does this passage mean?
How does this information relate to my prior knowledge?
Apologies if I couldn't help.. And if my order is wrong try;
How does this information relate to my prior knowledge?
Why am I reading this?
What's my reading plan?
What does this passage mean?
The meaning of an interpretation is a clarification of a perspective on an individual, place, work, thing. A clarification is a bunch of proclamations for the most part developed to portray a bunch of realities which explains the causes, setting, and results of those realities.
<h3>How do the interpretations of facts presented by the authors differ from each other?</h3>
- The principal creator utilizes a review to help mind preparing games to make individuals more shrewd. Anyway the subsequent creator utilizes a review to show that insight remained something very similar after cerebrum preparing games.
- The creator accepts that cerebrum preparing programs make individuals more astute. Anyway the subsequent creator accepts that mind preparing programs are hurtful.
- The creator needs individuals to accomplish their wellbeing objectives. Be that as it may, the subsequent creator needs individuals to work on their presentation on explicit errands.
- The creator contends internet games are expected to further develop memory. Anyway the subsequent creator contends that any games will attempt to further develop memory.
For more information about interpretation refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/6783130
Answer:
Hera's orchard, also known as The Garden of Hesperides, has many magical apple trees in its fields. These apple trees provide golden apples with special magical properties.
Explanation:
:)
