Answer:
*assuming you know the concept of proportionality*
since L is directly proportional to T, an increase in L will result in an increase in T
so the solution of the first part is increases
in part 2, y is inversely proportional to x
which means that an increase in y will result in a decrease in x and vice-versa
So the answer of the second part is decreases
in part 3, since x is directly proportional to y, an increase in x will result in an increase in y
I think that is 45 am not sure but i think that is the anwer
Answer: C
Step-by-step explanation:
It’s 2x3x3x5 because 9 isn’t prime
21−=2(2−)=2cos(−1)+2 sin(−1)
−1+2=−1(2)=−1(cos2+sin2)=cos2+ sin2
Is the above the correct way to write 21− and −1+2 in the form +? I wasn't sure if I could change Euler's formula to =cos()+sin(), where is a constant.
complex-numbers
Share
Cite
Follow
edited Mar 6 '17 at 4:38
Richard Ambler
1,52199 silver badges1616 bronze badges
asked Mar 6 '17 at 3:34
14wml
23122 silver badges99 bronze badges
Add a comment
1 Answer
1
No. It is not true that =cos()+sin(). Notice that
1=1≠cos()+sin(),
for example consider this at =0.
As a hint for figuring this out, notice that
+=ln(+)
then recall your rules for logarithms to get this to the form (+)ln().
