1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
1 year ago
8

What would happen if Turkey increased its investment in education by opening new schools and hiring more teachers in small commu

nities?
A.
It would lead to a shift from industry to agriculture.

B.
It would increase the standard of living in the country.

C.
It would increase barriers to international trade.

D.
It would lead to a shift from communism to capitalism.
History
1 answer:
kakasveta [241]1 year ago
8 0
B. It would increase the standard of living. Countries with higher literacy rates have higher standards of living.
You might be interested in
GIVING EASY BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

ummm B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Britian pass the Coercive Acts? What group was affected?
RSB [31]

Answer:

Punishment. Massachussetts Colonists/Colonists in America.

Explanation:

The Bristist Parliment passed a series of laws in 1774, after the Boston Tea Party. This was also know as the intolerable acts. They passed these laws to punish the colonists for the Boston Tea Party.

The five Intolerable Acts were:

  • Boston Port Act.
  • Administration of Justice Act.
  • Massachusetts Government Act.
  • Quartering Act.
  • Quebec Act.

I hope this helps!

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following sister disciplines of history focuses on the study of intellectual and artistic accomplishments, products
sammy [17]
It would be primarily the discipline of "humanities" that focuses on the study of intellectual and artistic accomplishments, products, and efforts, since the focus he is on "human" accomplishments and issues in general. <span />
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which identifies the significance of the Nuremberg trials?
coldgirl [10]
<span>A. provided a precedent for international cooperation and justice for all war crimes</span>

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the effect of so much trade in Byzantium?
    5·1 answer
  • Nationally, what percentage of the white vote went to trump?
    12·2 answers
  • Why was a large part of ancient egypt called the red lands?
    10·1 answer
  • Roy is an archaeologist during a recent archaeologist dig in china he discovered quite a tablet that contains a series of diagra
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements describe Thomas Jefferson? Select the three correct answers. A. Second president of the United States B. Consid
    11·1 answer
  • What was the name of the powerful, prominent Italian merchant family associated with the Renaissance?
    15·2 answers
  • Which country supported South Vietnam prior to the Vietnam War?
    5·1 answer
  • To what extent where africans successful in resisting slavery
    10·1 answer
  • Why is Nathan Hale important to the revolutionary period?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!