Answer:
<em><u> </u></em><em><u>The </u></em><em><u>state </u></em><em><u>of </u></em><em><u>being</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>free </u></em><em><u>within </u></em><em><u>society</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>from </u></em><em><u>oppres</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>ive </u></em><em><u>restrictions</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>imposed </u></em><em><u>by </u></em><em><u>authorities </u></em><em><u>on </u></em><em><u>one's </u></em><em><u>way </u></em><em><u>of </u></em><em><u>life </u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>behaviour</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>or </u></em><em><u>political</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>views.</u></em>
<em><u>I </u></em><em><u>hope </u></em><em><u>it </u></em><em><u>is </u></em><em><u>helpful</u></em>
Three pieces of evidence support this belief, these are the lines "they thought of how they had laboured," "what discouragements they had overcome" and "they gambolled round and round the windmill, uttering cries of triumph."
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Animals are being exploited and living in bad conditions, even after the revolution that promised them so much.
- This was all aggravated after the windmill stopped working, as it was essential for the farm's well-being.
- All of this made them feel very despondent about the whole situation.
- When the windmill was recovered, they felt very happy and ignored all the problems they were going through.
- They skipped around the mill, as its working was a point of happiness amidst the difficulties they were going through.
With that, even though there were still many problems on the farm, they felt excited, mainly because the mill was fixed by their work.
This question is about "Animal Farm" and you can find more information about it here:
brainly.com/question/11909124
Answer:
It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
Explanation:
Based on the given lines, it can be inferred that Allen shared his opinion and he believes that the specific case could be analyzed in a manner that is similar to those used for other similar cases. This is based on the line in the text as quoted above. The suggestions from everyone on the specific issue can be tabled and considered.
Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
On the day Janet was scheduled to give her speech, her class was relocated into an auditorium. Janet couldn't quite overcome the feeling of isolation she felt as she spoke to her twenty classmates in a room that could seat 500. Which of the following elements is most responsible for Janet's reaction?
A) Feedback
B) Context
C) Information source
D) Channel
Answer:
The best answer is letter B) Context
Explanation:
The context of a speech involves several aspects, such as the place and time, the purpose, the traits of the audience, how big the audience and the place are, what types of technology will be used etc. From what was explained in the question, Janet's speech had a sudden change in context that impacted Janet negatively. She was prepared to speak to 20 people, quite an "intimate" audience. She probably rehearsed her speech having in mind a smaller room, maybe not even considering the use of a microphone. When she was asked to speak at a room that could seat 500, the whole context change. She felt isolated, surrounded by emptiness instead of the warmth of 20 people in a smaller room. She probably had to speak louder or use a microphone. The change in context was so big that it interfered with Janet's previous preparation and caused her to react negatively.
