Answer:
The correct answer is b. Regressive coping.
Explanation:
Coping. This concept has been important in the field of psychology for more than 40 years. During the years 1940 and 1950 it meant an organizational concept in the description and clinical evaluation and, at present, it constitutes the center of a whole series of psychotherapies and educational programs that aim to develop adaptive resources. The issue of coping has also received a lot of attention in the media, as can be seen by flipping through the index of any magazine, book sales lists or programming guides. Actually, the word coping is both a colloquial and scientific term. Despite its prolific history and its current popularity, there is still a lack of coherence regarding theories, research and understanding of the subject. Even the most superficial review of what is written by both scholars and laymen, already reveals confusion regarding the meaning of coping and its role in the adaptation process.
Answer:
It might lead to over-optimistic projections
Explanation:
In simple words, the problem with using profitability index as the index criteria lies with the procedure of estimating it. In order to consider the business situation, the organisational finance group requires to settle with the corporation supervisors.
Leadership may be too enthusiastic about their assignment, so forecasts for cash flow may be too substantial. Consequently, in predicting the profitability index, there may be an uptrend prejudice.
Answer:
Chocolates R' Us, Inc.
Family hostility cannot be used as an argument to void the family attribution rules.
Lucy is still legally married to Desi. What the husband, Desi, therefore, owes, she owes equally despite their separation and her intention to reduce her ownership in their joint company.
Explanation:
Family Attribution Rules: Section 318 of the Internal Revenue Code says an individual shall be considered as owning the stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for his spouse and his children, grandchildren, and parents, including legally adopted children.
Based on the scenario, it is likely that Joe has made a non-programmed
decision in a way of implementing a programmed decision.
A programmed decision is a way of deciding that is easy in
regards of the individual to decide in a certain decision where as a
non-programmed decision is a way of using logic in which there is high risk
level involved in a decision.