Answer:
well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.
Explanation:
A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.
B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.
C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.
with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.
please make me brainliest.
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
The builder is at fault, however if there is no legal document that he has signed to say that he would complete the work and help them, then he isn’t liable.
Answer:
Ask how did he fall. where from. and why he believes it was the designer's fault.
Explanation:
Hope that helped
Answer:
c. contributory negligence
Explanation:
Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.
Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.
If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.
For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence
