Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
Answer: Safety means to be protected or protect someone or something in ANY type of risk, no matter what circumstance. Take for example, a falling tree. In this scenario, the victim should be protected by some sort of implanted gear provided by the property to protect the individual from injury. Another scenario I could provide would be basic, like a sharp kitchen knife. The knife should be placed out of reach for the purpose of keeping a minor safe in the household. Most adults would also provide themselves with extra safety such as gloves, this way the blade isn’t able to cut through the skin of one.
Explanation: Hope this helps! :)
Ambiguity or fallacy is a word, statement, or phrase that contains more than just one meaning.
I hope this helps (:
I would have to say C.) Shot open. because it let's the reader immediately know she is scared. Therefore giving you the tone of the passage.
A theme is a central topic,subject,or message within a narrative.
