Answer:
<u>Negative Reinforcement</u> is the process of strengthening a behavior by contingently withdrawing something displeasing.
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement is basically a part of operant conditioning in which the behaviour is increased by avoiding the negative consequences. Active avoidance of an aversive stimulus increases desired behaviour.
<u>For example</u> : Child increases his kind behaviour towards the younger brother to avoid getting scolded.
Answer:
do wants us to say a rock or something else?
Explanation:
<span>Organic foods tend to have higher levels of nutrients than nonorganic foods. The statement is False. Organic foods is also required to meet possible and same standards as that of non-organic foods. Since, organic is different from non-organic, then it has additional set of standards. In terms of product consistency, then organic foods are not into that.</span>
Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
