Answer:
<em>Price per cookie $5.5</em>
Explanation:
The cost per cookies inclusive of wastage
$3× 100/(100-12)
=$3.409
<em>Total cost for 150 units</em>
= 150× 43.409
= $511.36
<em>Total sales value for 150 units</em>
= $511.36 + (60% × 511.36)
= $818.1818
Selling price per unit
<em>=</em><em>$818.18/150 units</em>
<em>= $5.5</em>
Answer:
Report a prior period adjustment decreasing retained earnings by $1,040,000
Explanation:
Report a prior period adjustment decreasing retained earnings by $1,040,000
Dr Retained earnings $1,040,000
Dr Deferred tax liability $560,000
(35%×$1,600,000)
Cr Estimated warranty liability $1,600,000
Therefore As a result of this change, the firm would Report a prior period adjustment decreasing retained earnings by $1,040,000
Based on the useful life and the appraised age of the house, the effective age is <u>3 years.</u>
<h3>What is the effective age?</h3>
- It is the age of a structure based on its physical condition and upkeep.
- It is found by subtracting the remaining economic life from the economic life of the structure.
As a result of the physical condition and upkeep of the property, the appraiser estimates it to be equivalent to a 3 year old home. This is therefore the effective age.
Find out more on appraisals at brainly.com/question/15032807.
Answer:
D) Catering to entrepreneurs
Explanation:
Catering to entrepreneurship is a business practice carried out by corporations that generally seek to purchase start ups for the new technologies that they developed (including patents) rather than for their business model or profits. E.g. [email protected] paid $2 billion for Oculus, and Google acquired Nest for $3.2 billion. None of these companies actually made any money, but the innovations that they develop may generate a lot of money if they are backed up by a major player.
In this case, catering for entrepreneurs is a similar concept applied within an organization that tries to foster innovations.
Dane and the other stockholders will lose their investments but nothing else. Because Dane and others are stockholders in this company, they will lose the money that they had invested in the company and they will no longer receive any dividend from the company again because the company has gone bankrupt. Dane and others are not liable for other debts that had been acquired by the company.
